What boards are accountable for, but rarely measure
Most governance instruments tell you how people feel. They don't tell you whether the structure is working.
- Whether managers possess the authority required to discharge their accountability
- Where accountability transmission weakens between organisational layers
- Where executive and operational experience diverge significantly
- Which structural risks warrant board attention
The report analyses organisational experience by management layer, revealing where accountability strengthens, weakens, or breaks down as it moves through the organisation.
Without this evidence, structural problems get diagnosed as people problems — and stay invisible until something goes wrong.
Evidence your board can act on
The Three60 Board Report is a governance instrument — not a culture survey, not a performance tool. Aggregated, anonymised, and independent of the internal dynamics that typically shape what boards are told.
- Where authority is clear — and where it is absent or disputed
- Where accountability breaks down across organisational layers
- Where the gap between senior and operational experience is wide enough to warrant board attention
For organisations that want to act on the findings: 60-Day Accountability Alignment Programme
Why this produces results other instruments miss
Most persistent organisational problems have structural causes. Our instruments measure three things that standard surveys do not reach:
- How authority actually flows — not on paper, but in practice
- Where accountability breaks down structurally, and at which layer
- Whether roles are designed at the right level of complexity for the people in them
The patterns are immediately recognisable: the manager who cannot decide without escalating, the layer that reviews without adding value, the role that is nominally senior but structurally powerless. Our instruments make them measurable.
CaC Management
Robert Teunissen has worked with boards and senior leaders at the European Commission, WHO, FAO, Nestlé, and Alstom over more than 30 years, and founded CaC Management in Geneva in 2007 to apply that experience through a structured, instrument-based practice.
Every engagement receives direct attention from the person who designed the instruments. This is a deliberately small practice, and we keep it that way.
Ready to see what the evidence shows?
A 30-minute conversation is enough to establish whether this is the right instrument for your situation. No presentation, no obligation.