What makes this different
- Analyses organisations by layer, not by department
- Identifies structural governance risks, not employee sentiment
- Identifies where governance risks originate within the organisational structure
See what's inside
The report is designed for board-level decision-making. These four pages illustrate how governance risks are identified, explained and prioritised. The downloaded version contains all 11 pages exactly as shown here.
Cover
The report opens with the organisation, wave and date of assessment.
Executive Findings
The three issues the Board should discuss first.
Structural Governance Analysis
Where accountability transmission breaks down between layers.
Governance Review
Where governance alignment weakens across organisational layers.
What the report reveals
Most governance instruments tell you how people feel. The Three60 Board Report tells you whether the structure is enabling accountability — or working against it.
- Whether managers possess the authority their accountability requires
- Whether accountability is genuinely owned — or only exists on paper
- Where accountability transmission weakens between organisational layers
- Where executive and operational experience diverge significantly
Responses are analysed by organisational layer rather than as a single average score, allowing the board to identify where accountability and execution progressively weaken.
The report identifies where perceptions diverge between organisational layers and whether those divergences indicate normal variation or emerging governance risk.
What the report contains
Structured for board-level reading. Each section answers a governance question — not a list of actions for a people team.
- Executive summary
- Cross-layer alignment analysis
- Governance risks
- Executive perception gaps
- Board inquiry priorities
- Stabilisation priorities
- Governance review across nine domains
All data is aggregated and anonymised. No individual is identifiable. Delivered as a PDF suitable for board circulation.
No sales newsletter. We'll send the report by email and may follow up once to ask whether you found it useful.
How the review works
From scoping conversation to delivered report: six to eight weeks. Configured to your structure — not a standard package.
- Scoping — a 30–45 minute conversation to establish organisational scope, relevant layers, and contextual factors
- Assessment — participants receive a secure, anonymous link; 15–20 minutes to complete; no software or login required; EU-hosted, GDPR-compliant
- Analysis — data is processed once the assessment period closes; the report is produced and reviewed
- Debrief — a structured board-level conversation walking through findings, structural signals, and governance implications
Ready to see what the evidence shows?
A 30-minute conversation is enough to establish whether this is the right instrument for your situation. No presentation, no obligation.